Ceteris Paribus: How to Fairly Compare Rental Income to DST Income
Real estate investors often measure the income from a Delaware Statutory Trust against what they collect from their own rental properties. On the surface, the comparison seems simple: look at the rent coming in, look at the projected distribution rate of a DST, and see which number is bigger.
But as every economist knows, you get a very different answer when you hold all else equal—the principle known as ceteris paribus.
When clients sit down and go line-by-line, they often discover something surprising: the DST may produce more income than their rentals once every expense and responsibility is properly accounted for.
The Mistake Most Investors Make: Comparing Only the Top Line
Investors frequently compare their gross rent to the DST distribution rate. That’s understandable, but it is also misleading.
Your rental property's top-line income is not your real income. The DST’s distribution, however, is net of all property-level expenses. To make a fair comparison, both sides must be viewed after costs are deducted.
Common items investors forget to include:
• Insurance
• Property taxes
• Maintenance and repairs
• Yard work and seasonal upkeep
• Capital replacements (appliances, HVAC units, roofs)
• Vacancy
• Property management fees—formal or informal, including your own labor
• Rent that hasn’t been raised to market levels
In other words, a true apples-to-apples comparison requires a disciplined accounting of every dollar spent to maintain the rental.
A Real Example: The Missing Expenses That Changed Everything
I once reviewed income figures with a client who believed their rentals produced more income than the DST they were considering. The difference wasn’t large, but they felt the DST came in slightly lower.
Once we walked through their actual annual costs, several items emerged:
• They had recently replaced appliances but didn’t include those expenses in their calculation.
• Yard work was expected within six months—again, not included.
• They admitted they hadn’t raised the rent in years because they didn’t want to deal with difficult conversations.
When we added everything together, the picture changed dramatically. Their true net income was not only below the DST; it was below it by a meaningful margin.
The economics were clear: once they removed toilets, tenants, and trash from their day-to-day life, they also removed the hidden costs that had been quietly eroding their returns.
The Rent-Increase Problem: A Hidden Drag on Returns
Many long-term landlords under price their rent without realizing it. Some hesitate to raise rents out of loyalty to long-time tenants; others worry about turnover or conflict.
But holding rent stagnant has real consequences:
• Income falls behind inflation.
• Expenses continue rising.
• Net operating income shrinks even if the property stays occupied.
DSTs, by contrast, are managed by institutional operators who regularly evaluate rents relative to market conditions. Investors don’t have to make those uncomfortable decisions themselves. The result is often a stronger, more predictable net yield.
Why DSTs Frequently Deliver Higher Net Income
Once the numbers are examined through a true ceteris paribus lens—after all expenses, risks, and labor are accounted for—the DST often compares favorably.
DST income is:
• Net of property taxes
• Net of insurance
• Net of repairs and maintenance
• Net of capital improvements
• Net of professional management
• Free of the time, stress, and decision-making required to operate rentals
When you adjust for the real costs of owning rentals—not just the visible ones—the DST’s net income frequently exceeds investors' existing cash flow.
The Bottom Line
Rental income can look attractive at first glance. But economic comparisons require more than a top-line number. A fair, apples-to-apples analysis often shows that DSTs may deliver equal or better net income—without the headaches that come with being a landlord.
The lesson is simple: when comparing income streams, apply ceteris paribus and look beyond the surface. You may find the DST is not just simpler,but more profitable than expected.


